Lo Scalpello - Journal https://www.loscalpellojournal.com/ <div class="section "> <div> <h2>Cos’è Lorem Ipsum?</h2> <p><strong>Lorem Ipsum</strong> è un testo segnaposto utilizzato nel settore della tipografia e della stampa. Lorem Ipsum è considerato il testo segnaposto standard sin dal sedicesimo secolo, quando un anonimo tipografo prese una cassetta di caratteri e li assemblò per preparare un testo campione. È sopravvissuto non solo a più di cinque secoli, ma anche al passaggio alla videoimpaginazione, pervenendoci sostanzialmente inalterato. Fu reso popolare, negli anni ’60, con la diffusione dei fogli di caratteri trasferibili “Letraset”, che contenevano passaggi del Lorem Ipsum, e più recentemente da software di impaginazione come Aldus PageMaker, che includeva versioni del Lorem Ipsum.</p> </div> </div> Pacini Editore s.r.l. en-US Lo Scalpello - Journal 0390-5276 <p><strong>AUTHORSHIP STATEMENT FORM</strong><br><strong>The corresponding author must sign the <a title="AUTHORSHIP STATEMENT FORM" href="/libraryFiles/downloadPublic/5" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Authorship Statement Form</a>, save it in .pdf and return it by uploading at our submission platform http://www.loscalpellojournal.com/.</strong></p> <p><strong>It is the policy of the Journal to correspond exclusively with one designated corresponding author. As the corresponding author, it is your responsibility to communicate with your co-authors.</strong></p> <p><strong>AUTHORSHIP RESPONSIBILITY</strong></p> <p>(1) All authors participated sufficiently in the intellectual content, analysis of data (if applicable) and writing of the article, by the criteria for authorship by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (http://www.icmje.org/). (2) The corresponding author certifies that the definitive version of the manuscript has been approved by all co-authors, as well as, director of the Institute or Department where the work has been carried out. (3) All persons who have made substantial contributions to the work reported in this manuscript (e.g., data collection, writing or editing assistance) but who do not fulfill the authorship criteria are named along with their specific contributions as an acknowledgement in the manuscript. The corresponding author certifies that all persons named in the acknowledgement section have provided written permission to be named. (4) All authors have reviewed the final version of the article and approve it for publication. (5) Authors must state that the article submitted has previously published, and is not under consideration or accepted for publication (in whole or in part) elsewhere nor have assigned any right or interest in the article to any third party. (6) Written permission from the authors to reproduce any material copyright elsewhere has been obtained prior to submission. (7) Authors must specify that consent has been obtained from taking part in the investigations or, in the case of paediatric patients, from the guardian/s and that they have obtained written releases from patients whose names or photographs are submitted as part of the article. (8) For reports containing original corresponding author should have full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data accuracy of data analysis. (9) Any manuscript concerned with human subjects, medical records, or human tissue that is submitted “Lo Scalpello Journal” should comply with the principles stated in the Declaration of Helsinki “Ethical Principles Medical Research Involving ‘Human Subjects”, adopted by the 18 World Medical Assembly, Helsinki, Finland, June 1964, amended most recently by the 64 World Medical Assembly, Fontaleza, Brazil, October 2013. If the study involves human subjects or records of human patients ethical approval MUST have been obtained. The corresponding author must state ethical approval was given, by whom and the relevant Judgementʼs reference number. The manuscript should contain a statement that the work has been approved by the appropriate Ethical Committee related to the institution(s) in which the work was and that subjects gave informed consent to the work. “Lo Scalpello Journal” requires institutional Ethics Committee approval for all human studies. For retrospective studies on patientsʼ records either a statement of approval or a statement exemption from the Committee is required. <strong>Ref N° of the Ethical Committee Approval must be indicated in the <a title="AUTHORSHIP STATEMENT FORM" href="/libraryFiles/downloadPublic/5" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Authorship Statement Form</a>. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee (the Name of the Institution must indicated in the <a title="AUTHORSHIP STATEMENT FORM" href="/libraryFiles/downloadPublic/5" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Authorship Statement Form</a>) and this is clearly stated in the Methods section of the article.</strong> This statement should also be provided upon submission of the manuscript. Studies involving experiments with animals must state that their was in accordance with institution guidelines and relevant national laws. (10) The article contains no libelous or unlawful statements,<br>does not infringe the privacy of others, or contains material or instructions that might cause harm or injury. The corresponding author shall indemnify and hold the Editors and its agents and licensees harmless from any damages, costs, and expenses reasonable attorneyʼs fees and costs of settlement) resulting by reason of any claim, action, or proceeding finally sustained settled inconsistent with the foregoing warranties and representations. (11) All manuscripts are screened for plagiarism, which<br>implies immediate rejection. Suspected plagiarism is handled in accordance with the COPE flowcharts (http://publicationethics.org/resources/flowcharts).<br>Every author or co-author of any article published in this Journal is solely responsible for the contents of the article, for the statement made in their paper and for the material sent. Every author or co-author needs to fully comply with the Regulation 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation): “<em>Article 9. Processing of personal data revealing racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, or trade union membership, and the processing of genetic data, biometric data for the purpose of uniquely identifying natural person, data concerning health or data concerning a natural person's sex life or sexual orientation shall be prohibited</em>”.</p> <p><strong>PRIVACY POLICY STATEMENT.</strong> Personal data of the author will be managed by the Publisher in full compliance with the legislation on the privacy protection (art. 13 of EU regulation 2016/6799). According to articles 15-20 of the GDPR, any author may exercise specific rights, including the right to obtain access to personal data in an intelligible form, correct, update or them. Authors will also have the right to obtain from the Publisher limitation of data processing, and may also oppose to data processing legitimate reasons. In the case that the author believes that processing of his/her own personal data infringes GDPR regulation, he/she has the right to make a complaint to the Supervisory Authority for the Protection of Personal Data to art. 77 of the GDPR. Controller of data processing, according to art. 4.1.7 of the GDPR, is Mrs. Donatella Paoletti for Pacini Srl, with registered office in 56121 Pisa, Italy, Via A Gherardesca n. 1. To exercise the rights of GDPR referred to in paragraph same article, you can address any request for information to the following e-mail: privacy@pacinieditore.it. For further information refer to the website: <a href="https://www.loscalpellojournal.com/privacy-policy" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://www.loscalpellojournal.com/privacy-policy</a></p> <p><strong>FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE</strong>. All authors must state any information that may be perceived as potential conflict of interest. must disclose all their affiliations including any relevant personal or institutional financial involvement (employment by an concern, consultancies, honoraria, speakers bureau, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants received or pending, membership on a standing advisory council or committee, a seat on the board of directors, or being publicly associated with company or its products, royalties, donation of medical equipment, etc.) with any organization that to any authorʼs knowledge direct interest, particularly a financial interest, in the subject matter or materials discussed. This declaration will be treated Editor as confidential while the paper is under review, and will not be made known to Reviewers. Please indicate on the <a title="AUTHORSHIP STATEMENT FORM" href="/libraryFiles/downloadPublic/5" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><strong>Authorship Statement Form</strong></a> whether or not you have or may have such a conflict of interest regarding the content of this article and nature of it.</p> <p><strong>COPYRIGHT TRANSFER AGREEMENT</strong>. (a) Authors assign to “Lo Scalpello Journal”, all copyright in and to including but not limited to the right to publish, republish, transmit, sell, distribute and otherwise use the article in whole or electronic and print editions of the Journal and in derivative works throughout the world, in all languages and in all media expression now known or later developed, and to license or permit others to do so. (b) The authors retain all proprietary rights, than copyright, such as patent rights. The authors retain the right to reuse any portion of the work, without charge, in personal compilations or other publications consisting solely of the author(sʼ) own works, including the author(sʼ) personal web home and to make copies of all or part of the Work for the author(sʼ) use for lecture or classroom purposes. The corresponding declares that any person named as co-author of the article is aware of the submission and has agreed to being so named. corresponding author accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors. The corresponding declares that statements and opinions given in the article are the expression of the authors. Responsibility for the content article rests upon the authors.</p> Introduction https://www.loscalpellojournal.com/article/view/346 <p>It is with genuine enthusiasm and pride that we present the project strongly desired by the entire Board of Directors and the OTODI scientific committee:</p> <p>“Hip fractures in the elderly: medial femoral neck fractures in patients over 75 years of age – A multicenter analysis of 1,500 cases in Italy”</p> <p>This work is not only one of the largest investigations of its kind in our country and probably throughout the world’s orthopedic field but also a clear demonstration of what can be achieved when competence, collaboration and vision converge towards a common goal.</p> <p>Fractions of the proximal femur remain a dramatic turning point in the lives of elderly patients, often marking the line between independence and loss of autonomy. <br>Facing this challenge requires not only the technical excellence present in the Orthopedics departments in Italy but requires a shared effort that unites orthopedists, anesthesialists, geriatricians, rehabilitation specialists to improve not only survival but also functional recovery and quality of life for thousands of elderly patients <br>every year.</p> <p>Scientific investigations of this relevance can demonstrate how good clinical practices based on scientific evidence are to be pursued to continue to improve the level of care we provide to our patients.</p> Stefano Giaretta Copyright (c) 2025 © Ortopedici Traumatologi Ospedalieri d’Italia (O.T.O.D.i.) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 2025-09-24 2025-09-24 39 29 29 Multicentric analysis by OTODI on 1500 Italian patients https://www.loscalpellojournal.com/article/view/347 <p>Among the initiatives undertaken by the OTODI Executive Board for the 2023-2025 term, an important in-depth scientific analysis has been approved and initiated. This project was inspired by the fundamental principles of OTODI: inclusiveness and the promotion of open peer debate. The federation, composed of 17 regional societies, successfully established an extensive national network aimed, among other objectives, at systematic information and data collection.<br>In this recent endeavor, the coordination capacity of the society was evaluated from a scientific perspective, with the objective of generating robust research outcomes that can be readily applied in clinical practice. The Executive and Scientific Boards identified a widely relevant topic capable of engaging numerous centers while ensuring significant scientific interest on both national and international levels. The chosen subject was the “treatment of medial femoral neck fractures in elderly patients over 75 years”, with a specific focus on comparing “press-fit” versus “cemented” femoral implants.</p> <p><a href="https://www.loscalpellojournal.com/article/view/347/452">See full text</a></p> Stefano Giaretta Copyright (c) 2025 © Ortopedici Traumatologi Ospedalieri d’Italia (O.T.O.D.i.) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 2025-09-24 2025-09-24 39 30 31 Robot-assisted vs conventional TKA: a retrospective observational study of clinical-functional outcomes https://www.loscalpellojournal.com/article/view/343 <p><strong>Introduction</strong>. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is increasingly performed worldwide due to population aging, rising life expectancy, and higher functional demands among elderly patients affected by advanced knee osteoarthritis. While conventional manual TKA remains the standard approach, robotic-assisted techniques both image-based and imageless, have been developed to enhance surgical precision and reproducibility. These technologies promise improved alignment and soft tissue balance, but their actual clinical advantages <br>remain under debate.<br><strong>Materials and methods</strong>. This retrospective study compared clinical and functional outcomes between two cohorts of patients undergoing TKA with the same posterior-stabilized (PS) implant: 114 patients treated with conventional TKA (Persona PS, Zimmer and Biomet) and 64 patients receiving robot-assisted TKA (using the MAKO system). All procedures were performed over a 12-month period, and patients were assessed preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively using the WOMAC, VAS, and KOOS scores.<br>Results. Both groups showed significant clinical improvement at one year. However, no statistically significant differences were found between the two techniques regarding patient-reported outcomes at any time point. The average operative time was significantly longer in the robotic group (80 minutes vs. 55 minutes for the conventional group), without a corresponding benefit in short- to mid-term outcomes.<br><strong>Conclusions</strong>. Although robotic-assisted TKA enhances surgical accuracy and is widely adopted by both experienced and novice surgeons, it does not appear to offer superior clinical or functional results compared to conventional TKA within the first postoperative year. Further long-term studies are required to determine whether these technological advancements translate into improved implant survival or patient satisfaction over time.</p> Laura Maria Dell'Aera Alessandro Geronimo Maria Lucia Mancini Giovanni Brunetti Copyright (c) 2025 © Ortopedici Traumatologi Ospedalieri d’Italia (O.T.O.D.i.) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 2025-09-24 2025-09-24 39 32 36 10.36149/0390-5276-343 Comparison of set-up time between suprapatellar and infrapatellar tibial nailing: are we saving time? https://www.loscalpellojournal.com/article/view/337 <p><strong>Objective</strong>. Tibial shaft fractures are typically managed with intramedullary nailing (IMN). The suprapatellar (SP) approach allows easier reduction of proximal tibial fractures and a more precise entry point when compared to the infrapatellar (IP) technique. The aim of this work is to compare the set-up time of the operating room between SP and IP approaches. <br><strong>Methods</strong>. A retrospective observational study was performed by consulting our surgical register. In all, 65 patients underwent IMN on through an SP approach and semi-extended knee, and 65 patients had an IP approach with a flexed knee on a traction table. The elapsed time from admission to the operating room and the beginning of the surgical procedure was noted for each patient. <br><strong>Results</strong>. The average time in the group treated with the IP approach was 39.6 minutes, while in the group treated with the SP approach it was 12.5 minutes with an average time saving of 27.1 minutes per patient. <br><strong>Conclusions</strong>. The potential superiority of the SP approach for IMN of the tibia is the subject of ongoing debate, but its advantages are widely reported in the literature. The result of our study suggests that the quicker and simpler set-up of the SP approach can facilitate the surgeon during the operation and allow significant time savings.</p> Paolo Bastia Lapo De Luca Simone Lazzeri Luigi Branca Vergano Copyright (c) 2025 © Ortopedici Traumatologi Ospedalieri d’Italia (O.T.O.D.i.) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 2025-09-24 2025-09-24 39 37 41 10.36149/0390-5276-337 Bone quality and thickness of femoral cortices in hip fractures https://www.loscalpellojournal.com/article/view/338 <p><strong>Background</strong>. Hip osteoarthritis and femoral neck fractures are two of the most prevalent orthopedic disorders afflicting the elderly, and both have major impact on overall health and quality of life. The thickness of femoral cortices appears to be of different dimensions in patients with osteoarthritis and femoral neck fracture.<br><strong>Sources of data</strong>. This study was conducted at the San Francesco D’Assisi Hospital in Oliveto Citra (SA) from September 2023 to September 2024. Forty patients over 65 years of age were selected, divided into two groups of 20 patients each, respectively with femoral neck fracture and advanced hip osteoarthritis.<br><strong>Areas of agreement</strong>. An important role in femoral neck fracture seems to be played by the thickness of the femoral cortices. This difference in thickness could be linked to greater fragility and susceptibility to fracture.<br><strong>Areas of controversy</strong>. It is not yet possible to determine a certain relationship between the thickness of the femoral cortices and which of them has a greater impact on the possibility of fracture.<br><strong>Growing points</strong>. In the analyzed patients who had a fracture of the femoral neck, it was seen that the thickness of the posterior cortex was significantly reduced.<br><strong>Areas timely for developing research.</strong> To date, due to the lack of specific screening protocols, it is not possible to ascertain a direct relationship between thickness of the femoral cortices and the probability of femoral neck fracture in the elderly.</p> Giuseppe Gargano Giampiero Calabrò Giacomo Vitali Gianluca Vecchio Salvatore Gatto Olimpio Galasso Copyright (c) 2025 © Ortopedici Traumatologi Ospedalieri d’Italia (O.T.O.D.i.) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 2025-09-24 2025-09-24 39 42 49 10.36149/0390-5276-338 Isolated greater trochanter fractures in THA: a narrative review https://www.loscalpellojournal.com/article/view/340 <p>Isolated fractures of the greater trochanter (Vancouver type AG) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) are quite rare but can significantly affect outcomes. These fractures may occur intraoperatively or postoperatively, with pain and impaired function. Treatment remains controversial with debate on the choice of conservative management or surgical fixation.<br><strong>Objective</strong>. This review summarizes the available evidence on incidence, risk factors, outcomes, and different kinds of surgical techniques.<br><strong>Methods</strong>. A PRISMA-guided search across four databases identified 24 relevant studies <br>from an initial pool of 389.<br><strong>Results</strong>. While nonoperative management yields good results for minimally displaced fractures, surgical fixation may be required for displaced or unstable cases, although complications and reoperations are not uncommon.<br><strong>Conclusions</strong>. No technique has shown clear superiority. More high-quality studies are needed to guide treatment strategies for this uncommon but impactful complication.</p> Marco Selmo Elisa Sartore Stefano Giaretta Copyright (c) 2025 © Ortopedici Traumatologi Ospedalieri d’Italia (O.T.O.D.i.) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 2025-09-24 2025-09-24 39 50 56 10.36149/0390-5276-340 Treatment of a multi-ligament knee injury in a patient with Parkinson’s disease. A case report https://www.loscalpellojournal.com/article/view/342 <p style="font-weight: 400;">Multi ligament knee injury can be associated or not with knee dislocation. Among irreducible knee dislocations, postero-lateral (PL) dislocations are the most common, with a higher rate of complications. We report on 63-year-old patient, with severe Parkinson’s disease, who had a traumatic PL knee dislocation with a multi-ligament knee injury. After a failed reconstruction procedure, due to severe dyskinesias (uncontrollable and involuntary muscular movements), the knee was still unstable, and a hinged total knee replacement was performed. PL dislocations can lead to very serious knee instability. Some conditions, like Parkinson’s disease, can complicate the treatment. A hinged prosthesis, although not representing the gold standard, can be considered as an alternative in complicated and highly selected cases, when repair or reconstruction is not possible.</p> Gianpaolo Chitoni Dariush Ghargozloo Emanuela Saccalani Luca Cannavò Copyright (c) 2025 © Ortopedici Traumatologi Ospedalieri d’Italia (O.T.O.D.i.) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 2025-09-24 2025-09-24 39 57 59 10.36149/0390-5276-342 Intraarticular injection of autologous microfragmented adipose tissue in knee osteoarthritis (preliminary results) https://www.loscalpellojournal.com/article/view/331 <p><strong>Objective</strong>. The aim of the study is to evaluate clinical and functional short-term outcomes in patients with mild-moderate knee osteoarthritis treated with intra-articular injection of autologous microfragmented adipose tissue. The results are analyzed considering body max index (BMI), Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS) and instrumental tests (X-ray, MRI).<br><strong>Material and methods</strong>. 34 patients with mild or moderate knee osteoarthritis (stages I, II and III of the Kellgren-Lawrence grading scale) underwent joint injection with autologous microfragmented adipose tissue (MF-AT), from December 2022 to December 2024. All the patients were selected considering the level of pain (number rate scale, NRS), functional abilities assessed via the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) at baseline, 6 months and 1 year. The results were analyzed considering age, <br>gender and imaging.<br><strong>Results</strong>. The average value of the Womac score in 34 patients with knee osteoarthritis parameters decreased from 64.85 points pre-operatively to 44.97 points at 6 months, while 22 patients showed 47.95 points of mean Womac score at one year. The average NRS values went from 4.15 points pre-operatively to 2.79 points at 6 months and 3.55 points at one year. <br>Non-significant differences in terms of improvement of the Womac score and the NRS scale were found in patients of different ages, gender, and BMI. Twenty-one of 34 (62%) patients expressed total or almost total satisfaction in terms of functional improvement, pain relief and ability to climb stairs. The treated lipoaspirate of 6 patients (18%), after informed and written consent submission, was collected and cryopreserved at Lipobank (Lipobank srl Viale Bianca Maria 24 – 20129 Milan).<br><strong>Conclusions</strong>. Intra-articular infiltration of autologous MF-AT is associated with a significant improvement in clinical and functional scores in patients with mild and moderate osteoarthritis at 6 months and 1 year of follow-up. Womac score and NRS were not significantly influenced by age, sex, or BMI. No adverse events were recorded during the procedure or post-operatively.</p> Ivano Valentino Teodoro Legittimo Angelo Rizza Calogero Alfonso Copyright (c) 2025 © Ortopedici Traumatologi Ospedalieri d’Italia (O.T.O.D.i.) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 2025-09-24 2025-09-24 39 60 66 10.36149/0390-5276-331