Lo Scalpello - Journal
https://www.loscalpellojournal.com/
<div class="section "> <div> <h2>Cos’è Lorem Ipsum?</h2> <p><strong>Lorem Ipsum</strong> è un testo segnaposto utilizzato nel settore della tipografia e della stampa. Lorem Ipsum è considerato il testo segnaposto standard sin dal sedicesimo secolo, quando un anonimo tipografo prese una cassetta di caratteri e li assemblò per preparare un testo campione. È sopravvissuto non solo a più di cinque secoli, ma anche al passaggio alla videoimpaginazione, pervenendoci sostanzialmente inalterato. Fu reso popolare, negli anni ’60, con la diffusione dei fogli di caratteri trasferibili “Letraset”, che contenevano passaggi del Lorem Ipsum, e più recentemente da software di impaginazione come Aldus PageMaker, che includeva versioni del Lorem Ipsum.</p> </div> </div>
Pacini Editore s.r.l.
en-US
Lo Scalpello - Journal
0390-5276
<p><strong>AUTHORSHIP STATEMENT FORM</strong><br><strong>The corresponding author must sign the <a title="AUTHORSHIP STATEMENT FORM" href="/libraryFiles/downloadPublic/5" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Authorship Statement Form</a>, save it in .pdf and return it by uploading at our submission platform http://www.loscalpellojournal.com/.</strong></p> <p><strong>It is the policy of the Journal to correspond exclusively with one designated corresponding author. As the corresponding author, it is your responsibility to communicate with your co-authors.</strong></p> <p><strong>AUTHORSHIP RESPONSIBILITY</strong></p> <p>(1) All authors participated sufficiently in the intellectual content, analysis of data (if applicable) and writing of the article, by the criteria for authorship by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (http://www.icmje.org/). (2) The corresponding author certifies that the definitive version of the manuscript has been approved by all co-authors, as well as, director of the Institute or Department where the work has been carried out. (3) All persons who have made substantial contributions to the work reported in this manuscript (e.g., data collection, writing or editing assistance) but who do not fulfill the authorship criteria are named along with their specific contributions as an acknowledgement in the manuscript. The corresponding author certifies that all persons named in the acknowledgement section have provided written permission to be named. (4) All authors have reviewed the final version of the article and approve it for publication. (5) Authors must state that the article submitted has previously published, and is not under consideration or accepted for publication (in whole or in part) elsewhere nor have assigned any right or interest in the article to any third party. (6) Written permission from the authors to reproduce any material copyright elsewhere has been obtained prior to submission. (7) Authors must specify that consent has been obtained from taking part in the investigations or, in the case of paediatric patients, from the guardian/s and that they have obtained written releases from patients whose names or photographs are submitted as part of the article. (8) For reports containing original corresponding author should have full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data accuracy of data analysis. (9) Any manuscript concerned with human subjects, medical records, or human tissue that is submitted “Lo Scalpello Journal” should comply with the principles stated in the Declaration of Helsinki “Ethical Principles Medical Research Involving ‘Human Subjects”, adopted by the 18 World Medical Assembly, Helsinki, Finland, June 1964, amended most recently by the 64 World Medical Assembly, Fontaleza, Brazil, October 2013. If the study involves human subjects or records of human patients ethical approval MUST have been obtained. The corresponding author must state ethical approval was given, by whom and the relevant Judgementʼs reference number. The manuscript should contain a statement that the work has been approved by the appropriate Ethical Committee related to the institution(s) in which the work was and that subjects gave informed consent to the work. “Lo Scalpello Journal” requires institutional Ethics Committee approval for all human studies. For retrospective studies on patientsʼ records either a statement of approval or a statement exemption from the Committee is required. <strong>Ref N° of the Ethical Committee Approval must be indicated in the <a title="AUTHORSHIP STATEMENT FORM" href="/libraryFiles/downloadPublic/5" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Authorship Statement Form</a>. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee (the Name of the Institution must indicated in the <a title="AUTHORSHIP STATEMENT FORM" href="/libraryFiles/downloadPublic/5" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Authorship Statement Form</a>) and this is clearly stated in the Methods section of the article.</strong> This statement should also be provided upon submission of the manuscript. Studies involving experiments with animals must state that their was in accordance with institution guidelines and relevant national laws. (10) The article contains no libelous or unlawful statements,<br>does not infringe the privacy of others, or contains material or instructions that might cause harm or injury. The corresponding author shall indemnify and hold the Editors and its agents and licensees harmless from any damages, costs, and expenses reasonable attorneyʼs fees and costs of settlement) resulting by reason of any claim, action, or proceeding finally sustained settled inconsistent with the foregoing warranties and representations. (11) All manuscripts are screened for plagiarism, which<br>implies immediate rejection. Suspected plagiarism is handled in accordance with the COPE flowcharts (http://publicationethics.org/resources/flowcharts).<br>Every author or co-author of any article published in this Journal is solely responsible for the contents of the article, for the statement made in their paper and for the material sent. Every author or co-author needs to fully comply with the Regulation 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation): “<em>Article 9. Processing of personal data revealing racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, or trade union membership, and the processing of genetic data, biometric data for the purpose of uniquely identifying natural person, data concerning health or data concerning a natural person's sex life or sexual orientation shall be prohibited</em>”.</p> <p><strong>PRIVACY POLICY STATEMENT.</strong> Personal data of the author will be managed by the Publisher in full compliance with the legislation on the privacy protection (art. 13 of EU regulation 2016/6799). According to articles 15-20 of the GDPR, any author may exercise specific rights, including the right to obtain access to personal data in an intelligible form, correct, update or them. Authors will also have the right to obtain from the Publisher limitation of data processing, and may also oppose to data processing legitimate reasons. In the case that the author believes that processing of his/her own personal data infringes GDPR regulation, he/she has the right to make a complaint to the Supervisory Authority for the Protection of Personal Data to art. 77 of the GDPR. Controller of data processing, according to art. 4.1.7 of the GDPR, is Mrs. Donatella Paoletti for Pacini Srl, with registered office in 56121 Pisa, Italy, Via A Gherardesca n. 1. To exercise the rights of GDPR referred to in paragraph same article, you can address any request for information to the following e-mail: privacy@pacinieditore.it. For further information refer to the website: <a href="https://www.loscalpellojournal.com/privacy-policy" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://www.loscalpellojournal.com/privacy-policy</a></p> <p><strong>FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE</strong>. All authors must state any information that may be perceived as potential conflict of interest. must disclose all their affiliations including any relevant personal or institutional financial involvement (employment by an concern, consultancies, honoraria, speakers bureau, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants received or pending, membership on a standing advisory council or committee, a seat on the board of directors, or being publicly associated with company or its products, royalties, donation of medical equipment, etc.) with any organization that to any authorʼs knowledge direct interest, particularly a financial interest, in the subject matter or materials discussed. This declaration will be treated Editor as confidential while the paper is under review, and will not be made known to Reviewers. Please indicate on the <a title="AUTHORSHIP STATEMENT FORM" href="/libraryFiles/downloadPublic/5" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><strong>Authorship Statement Form</strong></a> whether or not you have or may have such a conflict of interest regarding the content of this article and nature of it.</p> <p><strong>COPYRIGHT TRANSFER AGREEMENT</strong>. (a) Authors assign to “Lo Scalpello Journal”, all copyright in and to including but not limited to the right to publish, republish, transmit, sell, distribute and otherwise use the article in whole or electronic and print editions of the Journal and in derivative works throughout the world, in all languages and in all media expression now known or later developed, and to license or permit others to do so. (b) The authors retain all proprietary rights, than copyright, such as patent rights. The authors retain the right to reuse any portion of the work, without charge, in personal compilations or other publications consisting solely of the author(sʼ) own works, including the author(sʼ) personal web home and to make copies of all or part of the Work for the author(sʼ) use for lecture or classroom purposes. The corresponding declares that any person named as co-author of the article is aware of the submission and has agreed to being so named. corresponding author accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors. The corresponding declares that statements and opinions given in the article are the expression of the authors. Responsibility for the content article rests upon the authors.</p>
-
Cemented vs uncemented hip hemiarthroplasty in medial femoral neck fractures in the elderly: the Association of Orthopaedic Traumatology of Italian Hospitals (OTODI) Multicenter Study
https://www.loscalpellojournal.com/article/view/356
<p class="p1"><strong>Background</strong>. The choice between cemented and uncemented hip hemiarthroplasty for medial femoral neck fractures in the elderly remains debated. While international guidelines often recommend cementation, modern uncemented designs offer potential advantages in operative efficiency.</p> <p class="p1"><strong>Methods</strong>. This OTODI (Orthopaedic Traumatology of Italian Hospitals)-coordinated, prospective multicenter study analyzed 1,417 patients over 75 years of age across 150 Italian centers. Clinical trends, operative parameters, and mid-term outcomes (up to 12 months) were compared between cemented and uncemented fixation.</p> <p class="p1"><strong>Results</strong>. Uncemented fixation was predominant (65.6%). The uncemented group showed significantly shorter mean operative times (62.0 vs. 72.8 minutes; p < 0.0001) and better initial functional scores (Barthel Index; p = 0.046). No significant differences were found in intraoperative complications, 12-month mortality, or long-term functional recovery.</p> <p class="p1"><strong>Conclusions</strong>. In Italian clinical practice, modern uncemented hip hemiarthroplasty are frequently utilized and provide comparable safety and efficacy to cemented stems. These findings support the use of modern uncemented designs as a reliable alternative that reduces operative time without compromising mid-term outcomes.</p>
Vincenzo Caiaffa
Fabrizio Cortese
Marco Mugnaini
Francesco Ippolito
Copyright (c) 2026 © Ortopedici Traumatologi Ospedalieri d’Italia (O.T.O.D.i.)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
2026-06-12
2026-06-12
40
1
6
10.36149/0390-5276-356
-
Arthroplasty of the hip and knee in athletes: risk, functional outcomes and return to sport
https://www.loscalpellojournal.com/article/view/357
<p class="p1"><strong>Introduction.</strong> The resumption of sports activity after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a topic of growing interest, given the decrease in the mean age of patients undergoing these surgical procedures and the higher functional expectations of younger individuals. However, no univocal guidelines are available, and contrasting opinions persist regarding which sports are safe after prosthetic implantation.</p> <p class="p1"><strong>Methods.</strong> A comparative narrative review of the evidence on return to sport (RTS) after THA and TKA was conducted. A literature search was performed on PubMed, analyzing studies published on the topic up to December 2024. Data were extracted on RTS rates, physical activity levels (UCLA and Tegner scores), mean recovery times, and the main predictive or limiting factors for RTS.</p> <p class="p1"><strong>Results.</strong> The vast majority of patients return to at least one sport after THA or TKA. Patients with THA show slightly higher average RTS rates (up to ~80-90% for low-impact activities) and faster initial recovery compared with TKA patients (RTS ~70-80%). Physical activity levels (UCLA, Tegner scores) improve in a clinically significant way after surgery in both groups. Younger age, male sex, normal BMI, high preoperative activity level, and strong personal motivation emerge as factors favoring successful RTS, whereas fear, residual pain, and stiffness may limit it. Low-impact sports are generally well tolerated and may be resumed within 3-6 months after surgery; high-impact sports carry greater risks, but recent evidence indicates that regular physical activity does not increase complication or revision rates in the medium term, thanks to advances in materials and implant design.</p> <p class="p1"><strong>Conclusions.</strong> RTS after hip or knee arthroplasty is a realistic and safe goal for most patients, contributing to improved quality of life. It is essential to personalize recommendations: prioritize low-impact activities and carefully evaluate return to more demanding sports, informing patients about potential risks. Further long-term studies are needed to better define recommendations, particularly for high-impact sports.</p>
Nicola Di Cristofaro
Luciano Mottola
Filippo Rosati
Giovanni Martinelli
Giuseppe Pellegrino
Massimo Russo
Achille Pellegrino
Copyright (c) 2026 © Ortopedici Traumatologi Ospedalieri d’Italia (O.T.O.D.i.)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
2026-06-12
2026-06-12
40
1
6
10.36149/0390-5276-357
-
Risk Factors for Infection in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Narrative Review according of the ICM Istanbul 2025
https://www.loscalpellojournal.com/article/view/358
<p class="p1"><span class="s1">Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains one of the most serious complications in modern orthopedics. Despite technological and surgical advances, its incidence remains stable, suggesting that prevention cannot rely exclusively on the surgical act.</span></p> <p class="p1">The 2025 International Consensus on Musculoskeletal Infections (ICM) held in Istanbul devoted extensive space to the analysis of preoperative risk factors, emphasizing the central role of the host and preoperative optimization.</p> <p class="p1">This narrative review systematically analyzes the main risk factors for infection in patients undergoing TKA, distinguishing between modifiable and non-modifiable factors, and discusses the practical implications for daily clinical management in light of the most recent ICM recommendations.</p>
Antonio Spinarelli
Matteo Berardi
Andrea Michele Abbaticchio
Maurizio Pastore
Giovanna Porcelli
Vito Conserva
Copyright (c) 2026 © Ortopedici Traumatologi Ospedalieri d’Italia (O.T.O.D.i.)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
2026-06-12
2026-06-12
40
7
18
10.36149/0390-5276-358
-
Different generations of dual mobility cup: from beginning to contemporary systems
https://www.loscalpellojournal.com/article/view/364
<p class="p1">Dual mobility cups (DMCs) were introduced in the 1970s to combine the low-friction concept of small femoral heads with the increased stability provided by larger articulations. Over the past five decades, DMCs have undergone substantial evolution in terms of design, materials, fixation methods, and polyethylene technology. This review analyzes the historical development of DMCs through three generations, focusing on the major complications encountered during their clinical use, including iliopsoas impingement, cup loosening, dislocation, intraprosthetic dislocation, accelerated wear, and infection. For each complication, the design modifications and technological advances introduced to improve implant performance are discussed. Contemporary third-generation systems have demonstrated excellent survivorship and low complication rates, while recent highly porous 3D-printed titanium designs may represent the beginning of a new generation of dual mobility implants. The continuous evolution of DMC technology has contributed to improved stability, fixation, and longevity, making these implants a valuable option in both primary and revision total hip arthroplasty.</p>
Francesco Taverniti
Emilia Caldari
Domenico Tigani
Enrico Ferranti Calderoni
Copyright (c) 2026 © Ortopedici Traumatologi Ospedalieri d’Italia (O.T.O.D.i.)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
2026-06-12
2026-06-12
40
19
22
10.36149/0390-5276-364
-
Positioning strategies in surgical management of trimalleolar ankle fractures
https://www.loscalpellojournal.com/article/view/365
<p class="p1"><strong>Objective</strong>. Trimalleolar ankle fractures are complex injuries typically managed via open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). While prone positioning is traditional for posterior malleolus access, floppy lateral positioning may improve the workflow for combined approaches. This study compared perioperative and radiographic outcomes between these two techniques.</p> <p class="p1"><strong>Methods</strong>. A retrospective cohort study of 87 adult patients (prone: n = 45; floppy lateral: n = 42) was conducted at a Level I trauma center (2020-2024). Outcomes included operative time, fluoroscopic exposure, reduction quality, and postoperative complications.</p> <p class="p1"><strong>Results</strong>. No significant differences were found in mean operative time (111.9 vs. 108.6 minutes; p = 0.235) or fluoroscopic exposure (39.0 vs. 38.4 seconds; p = 0.761). Both groups achieved high rates of anatomical reduction (92.77% vs. 92.42%; p = 0.561) with comparable complication rates and clinical outcomes.</p> <p class="p1"><strong>Conclusion</strong>. Floppy lateral positioning provides equivalent surgical efficiency and radiographic outcomes to prone positioning. The choice of position can be safely guided by surgeon preference and patient-specific safety considerations.</p>
Massimiliano Carrozzo
Michele Loiodice
Alessandro Scarpino
Raffaele De Gabriele
Priscilla D'Attis
Giovanni Vicenti
Giuseppe Solarino
Copyright (c) 2026 © Ortopedici Traumatologi Ospedalieri d’Italia (O.T.O.D.i.)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
2026-06-12
2026-06-12
40
32
38
10.36149/0390-5276-365
-
Chevron olecranon osteotomy and fixation with kirschner wires and tension band in the surgical treatment of distal humeral fractures in adults: clinical evaluation of 32 cases
https://www.loscalpellojournal.com/article/view/361
<p class="p1"><strong>Objective</strong>. This study aimed to evaluate long-term outcomes and complications after olecranon osteotomy for complex distal humerus fractures.</p> <p class="p1"><strong>Methods</strong>. We retrospectively reviewed adult patients with AO/OTA 13-C fractures treated by open reduction and internal fixation via olecranon osteotomy from 2005 to 2015. Thirty-two patients were assessed clinically and radiographically, and functional outcomes were measured using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) at a mean follow-up of 10 years.</p> <p class="p1"><strong>Results</strong>. Olecranon osteotomy for complex distal humerus fractures produced mostly positive outcomes: 84% of patients had excellent or good MEPS results. Mean flexion-extension was 100° (range 10°-130°). By fracture type, 100% of C1, 69% of C2, and 90% of C3 had excellent/good results. Complications included nonunion (1), implant prominence (10), heterotopic ossification (2), and ulnar nerve entrapment (2). The purpose of our study is to evaluate the long-term outcomes of patients with type C fractures treated surgically with Chevron olecranon osteotomy.</p> <p class="p1"><strong>Conclusions</strong>. Olecranon osteotomy provides adequate exposure and, with stable fixation and early rehabilitation, yields good long-term results with manageable complications. The retrospective design and small sample size are limitations of the study.</p>
Alessio Palumbo
Susanna Basciani
Antonio Caldaria
Luca Saccone
Edoardo Franzè
Giorgio Carrozzi
Francesco Franceschi
Copyright (c) 2026 © Ortopedici Traumatologi Ospedalieri d’Italia (O.T.O.D.i.)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
2026-06-12
2026-06-12
40
39
45
10.36149/0390-5276-361
-
Medial malleolar fractures: hook plates versus lag screws fixation. A prospective multicenter observational study
https://www.loscalpellojournal.com/article/view/366
<p class="p1"><strong>Objective</strong>. This prospective multicenter observational study compares clinical, functional, and radiological outcomes of hook plate versus lag screw fixation for medial malleolar fractures.</p> <p class="p1"><strong>Methods</strong>. Between June 1, 2019, and June 1, 2021, a prospective observational study was conducted across 5 hospitals. Sixty-one patients with isolated medial malleolar fractures or bimalleolar fractures were enrolled and assigned to two groups based on the treatment received: lag screw fixation (n <span class="s1">= </span>30) or hook plate fixation (n <span class="s1">= </span>31). Outcomes included AOFAS, OMAS, VAS scores and radiographic evaluations.</p> <p class="p1"><strong>Results</strong>. Hook plate fixation yielded higher AOFAS (90.2 ± 9.7 vs 74.3 ± 13.8; p<span class="s1"> = </span>0.001), OMAS (85.7 ± 9.5 vs 71.0 ± 13.6; p<span class="s1"> = </span>0.002), healing rate (100% vs 86.6%; p<span class="s1"> = </span>0.050), and shorter time to union (9.7 vs 13.3 weeks; p<span class="s1"> = </span>0.044).</p> <p class="p1"><strong>Conclusion</strong>. Hook plate fixation provides superior functional outcomes and higher healing rates compared to lag screws, particularly in osteoporotic or comminuted fractures. Careful patient selection and surgical technique are essential.</p>
Francesco Suraci
Cristiano Benelli
Benedetto Carta
Elisa Lamberti
Carola Morini
Riccardo Lanzetti
Domenico Topa
Roberto De Santis
Marco Rossini
Antonio Pasquale Vadalà
Copyright (c) 2026 © Ortopedici Traumatologi Ospedalieri d’Italia (O.T.O.D.i.)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
2026-06-12
2026-06-12
40
46
54
10.36149/0390-5276-366
-
Scapular asymmetry in tennis players: differential diagnosis and biomechanical insights
https://www.loscalpellojournal.com/article/view/367
<p class="p1"><strong>Objectives</strong>. To analyze the clinical significance of scapular asymmetry in tennis players and its differential diagnosis with scoliosis.</p> <p class="p1"><strong>Methods</strong>. Narrative review of biomechanical and clinical literature on overhead athletes, focusing on rotator cuff adaptations and inertial loading mechanisms.</p> <p class="p1"><strong>Results</strong>. Evidence indicates that scapular asymmetry in tennis players is associated with predominance of internal rotators, reduced external-to-internal rotator strength ratio, and repeated exposure to high inertial forces during overhead movements.</p> <p class="p1"><strong>Conclusions</strong>. Scapular asymmetry is more likely to represent a functional neuromuscular adaptation rather than a structural spinal deformity. Correct interpretation is essential to avoid misdiagnosis and to guide appropriate orthopedic evaluation.</p>
Rodolfo Lisi
Michele Perniola
Simone Cigni
Copyright (c) 2026 © Ortopedici Traumatologi Ospedalieri d’Italia (O.T.O.D.i.)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
2026-06-12
2026-06-12
40
55
59
10.36149/0390-5276-367
-
Femoral Neck System versus Cannulated Screws for Medial Proximal Femoral Fractures: A State-of-the-Art Review of Early Complications and Functional Outcomes
https://www.loscalpellojournal.com/article/view/371
<p style="font-weight: 400;"><strong>Abstract</strong></p> <p style="font-weight: 400;"><strong><em>Objectives</em></strong></p> <p style="font-weight: 400;">Displaced femoral neck fractures remain a challenging injury, particularly regarding implant selection for internal fixation. The Femoral Neck System (FNS) was developed to improve angular and axial stability compared with traditional cannulated screw fixation.</p> <p style="font-weight: 400;"><strong><em>Methods</em></strong></p> <p style="font-weight: 400;">A focused literature review comparing FNS and cannulated screws for femoral neck fracture fixation was performed using the Consensus platform, enabling analysis across millions of indexed scientific articles, and complemented by a targeted manual search. Based on relevance, methodological quality, and scientific impact, the 50 most influential studies were included. Early clinical and radiographic outcomes and implant-related complications within the first six months were analyzed.</p> <p style="font-weight: 400;"><strong><em>Results</em></strong></p> <p style="font-weight: 400;">The available evidence suggests that FNS fixation is associated with lower rates of early mechanical and biological complications and improved early functional recovery compared with cannulated screws, particularly in unstable fracture patterns.</p> <p style="font-weight: 400;"><strong><em>Conclusions</em></strong></p> <p style="font-weight: 400;">Current evidence indicates that the Femoral Neck System offers a more favorable short-term clinical profile than cannulated screw fixation for medial proximal femoral fractures. While both techniques achieve high union rates when adequate reduction is obtained, the biomechanical advantages of FNS appear clinically relevant within the first six months following surgery</p>
Lorenzo Fiore
Renato Matteotti
Giovanni Dalla Vecchia
Andrea Masotti
Luca Monticelli
Amedeo Manuel Mancini
Copyright (c) 2026 © Ortopedici Traumatologi Ospedalieri d’Italia (O.T.O.D.i.)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
2026-06-12
2026-06-12
40
60
69
10.36149/0390-5276-371